People v. Pacella CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 2014B251370California1,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 5/22/14 P. v. Pacella CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

THE PEOPLE, B251370

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LA073658) v.

RICHARD PACELLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Christine C. Ewell, Judge. Affirmed. Richard Pacella, in pro. per.; and William W. Lee, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ——————————

SUMMARY

An information alleged that on March 26, 2013, appellant Richard Pacella unlawfully possessed a controlled substance, specifically, “OXYCODONE,” for sale in violation of Health and Safety Code section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.