Marriage of Pittluck and Mimran CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 22, 2014B248057California2,205 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

Filed 5/22/14 Marriage of Pittluck and Mimran CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

In re Marriage of IAN JOSEPH B248057 PITTLUCK and RONI YAFIT MIMRAN. (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SD029726)

RONI YAFIT MIMRAN,

Appellant,

v.

IAN JOSEPH PITTLUCK,

Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, David J. Cowan, Commissioner. Affirmed. Roni Yafit Mimran, in pro. per., for Respondent and Appellant. Ian Joseph Pittluck, in pro. per., for Petitioner and Respondent. ——————————

SUMMARY

Roni Yafit Mimran (Mimran) appeals from a postjudgment family law order denying her request to modify a child custody order. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

It is not possible to provide a thorough overview of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.