Usdoj

MEMORANDUM

Federal prisoner William M. Bryson appeals pro se from the dismissal of his petition for a writ of audita querela requesting a refund of a $100 special assessment imposed as part of his sentence for money laundering. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo whether a federal prisoner may file a petition for a writ of audita querela, see United States v. Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d 1077, 1079 (9th Cir.2001) (per curiam), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record, see Holley v. Yarborough, 568 F.3d 1091, 1098 (9th Cir.2009).

Bryson contends that he is entitled to a refund because there is insufficient evidence to support his money laundering conviction. Dismissal of the petition was proper because these arguments are cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Valdez-Pacheco, 237 F.3d at 1079-80 (a writ of audita querela is only available to fill in “gaps” in postconviction remedies). That Bryson has already sought habeas relief and is now precluded from filing a section 2255 motion absent authorization from the Court of Appeals does not make a writ of audita querela available to him. See id. at 1080 .

We do not consider Bryson’s…