Jinbei Xue v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
575 F. App'x 745
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 23, 201412-73492California327 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jinbei Xue, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act, Shres-tha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039 (9th Cir.2010), and review de novo claims of due process violations in immigration proceedings, Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1011 (9th Cir.2010). We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s reliance on Xue’s inability to recall the days of the week on which specific events occurred. See Ren v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1079, 1085-86 (9th Cir.2011) (inconsistency regarding day incident occurred was “manifestly trivial” and could “not form a basis for an adverse credibility determination”). Substantial evidence also does not support the BIA’s reliance on Xue’s omission of being taken to a court because, contrary to the BIA’s finding, Xue was never…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.