Regents of University of California v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

Good Law
173 Cal. Rptr. 3d 80·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 530·226 Cal. App. 4th 1530·2014 WL 2750109·79 Cal. Comp. Cases 509
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2014G048217California2,410 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

We granted review in this writ proceeding to address two related issues: First, whether the Evidence Code statutes governing privilege are applicable to workers’ compensation administrative proceedings, and second, whether the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) acted improperly by ordering a party to produce documents it claims are privileged to a special master for the purpose of allowing the master to assess the merits of that privilege claim.

We conclude the Evidence Code statutes governing privilege are applicable in workers’ compensation proceedings. And because Evidence Code section 915 (section 915) expressly prohibits a tribunal from ordering a party to produce documents for review as a means of determining the validity of a claimed privilege, we also conclude the WCAB erred in this case by ordering that documents which petitioners, the Regents of the University of California (the University) and its claims agent Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. (Sedgwick), contend are privileged, must be produced to a special master. We return the case to the WCAB with directions to resolve the privilege dispute without any requirement the documents be subject…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.