Fundamental Partners v. Eggemeyer CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2014D064252California3,077 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 5/23/14 Fundamental Partners v. Eggemeyer CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FUNDAMENTAL PARTNERS, D064252

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 73-2013-00029777-

CU-SL-CTL)

JOHN M. EGGEMEYER, III et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Ronald S.

Prager, Judge. Affirmed.

Hulett Harper Stewart and Blake Muir Harper; The Brualdi Law Firm and John F.

Keating, Jr. for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Paul Hastings and William F. Sullivan, John S. Durrant, Elizabeth C. Mueller for

Defendants and Respondents White River Capital, Inc., William E. McKnight, John M.

Eggemeyer, III, John W. Rose, Richard D. Waterfield, Daniel W.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.