People v. Frisch CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 23, 2014B244985California3,829 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/14 P. v. Frisch CA2/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B244985

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA055518) v.

JOHN ANTHONY FRISCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Richard E. Naranjo, Judge. Affirmed as modified.

Susan Morrow Maxwell, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorney General, Stephanie A. Miyoshi and Nima Razfar, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

******

1 John Anthony Frisch appeals from his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.