Bisno

Bisno v. Kahn

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 27, 2014A133537MCalifornia10,542 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/23/14 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROBERT H. BISNO,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A133537

v. (Alameda County ROBERT J. KAHN et al., Super. Ct. No. RG09455030) Defendants and Respondents.

JAMES C. COXETER,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A134008

v. (Alameda County ROBERT J. KAHN et al., Super. Ct. No. RG10525649) Defendants and Respondents. ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

AND DENYING REHEARING

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 25, 2014, be modified as follows:

1. On page 1, in the last sentence of the first full paragraph, delete “and seek treble damages,” so that the sentence reads:

The judgment debtors now claim the forbearance fees are usurious.

2. On page 5, in the first line, replace the heading “The Coxeter and Bisno Usury Actions” with the following:

The Coxeter and Bisno…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.