People v. Moreno CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Defendant Daniel Jesus Moreno got into an argument with Tami Potter, a former
probation officer with the County of San Bernardino (the County). When Potter pushed
defendant in the chest, defendant stabbed Potter with a knife, killing her.1 Defendant was
charged with first degree murder.
To support possible defenses and lesser offenses, defendant filed a Pitchess2
motion to obtain documents and information regarding Potter from the County. The trial
court denied the request without conducting an in camera review of the requested
materials. A jury convicted defendant as charged.
We conditionally reversed that conviction in People v. Moreno, supra, 192
Cal.App.4th 692, and directed the trial court to conduct an in camera review of the
requested documents, order the disclosure of relevant information, allow defendant an
opportunity to demonstrate prejudice, and order a new trial if there was a reasonable
probability the outcome would have been different had the information been disclosed.
(Id. at pp. 703, 711-712.)
1 A summary of the evidence produced at trial is set forth in People v. Moreno (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 692 [Fourth…