Lumina

Lumina v. Umina CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2014C066560California4,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/28/14 Lumina v. Umina CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

LUKE ANTHONY PAUL LUMINA, C066560

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. PC20050702)

v.

LEONARD J. UMINA,

Defendant and Appellant.

In this case, defendant Leonard J. Umina seeks review of a money judgment against him for unjust enrichment. Finding no merit in his arguments, we affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Although the record on appeal here is quite extensive, for our purposes, the underlying facts may be briefly stated. Plaintiff Luke Lumina (formerly known as

1 Anthony Umina) is the father of Leonard and of plaintiff Michael Umina.1 Luke also has two daughters, Mary and Kathryn. In 1997, Luke sold a 50-acre parcel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.