In re S.R. CA2/6

FACTS

On December 30, 2010, a social worker from the Ventura County Human Services Agency (HSA) received information that mother was unable to take care of a child because of her drug addiction. Mother tested positive for methamphetamines at a probation office. When the testing took place, she was with S.R., her daughter who was born in February 2010. Mother had a history of using illegal drugs. In July 2010, she tested positive for Benzodiazepines. On January 19, 2011, a probation officer told HSA that mother violated her probation conditions because of a positive drug test and her failure to enroll in a drug treatment program. Mother was on probation after convictions of child abuse and drug possession. HSA took protective custody of S.R. Father subsequently agreed to a "safety plan," which provided S.R. would stay with him and mother would receive supervised visits. HSA filed a dependency petition for S.R. In March 2011, the juvenile court sustained the petition and found S.R. to be "a person described by subdivision (b) of Section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code." It ruled: 1) father would have custody of the child under HSA's supervision, and 2) HSA "shall…