Petrilli

People v. Petrilli

Good Law
172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 480·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 466·226 Cal. App. 4th 814·2014 WL 2210883·14 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5889
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2014A131141California4,893 words

Opinion

Opinion

Margulies, J.

Late one night, defendant Steven Petrilli drove a stolen minivan around San Francisco with his wife and two acquaintances. The acquaintances periodically left the van, committed a robbery, and returned to the van. Once they were back inside, defendant drove away. After the fourth such robbery, police spotted the van, and defendant drove off at a high speed. The subsequent pursuit ended when defendant rammed the van into a police car, killing a police officer in the car. Defendant was convicted of felony murder with special circumstances, as well as four counts of robbery and other crimes.

Defendant contends, and the Attorney General concedes, that the felony-murder conviction must be reversed because of instructional error. We agree.

Defendant also contends the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of his wife. She had earlier testified under subpoena before a grand jury investigating the incident, and when she sought to invoke the spousal testimonial privilege to avoid testifying at trial, the trial court ruled she had waived the privilege by appearing before the grand jury. Applying the plain language of Evidence Code section 973, which governs waiver of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.