Litwin

Litwin v. iRenew Bio Energy Solutions, LLC

Good Law
172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 328·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 468·226 Cal. App. 4th 877·2014 WL 2200686
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 28, 2014B248759California2,100 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Plaintiffs filed class action lawsuits against iRenew Bio Energy Solutions, LLC, Harvest Trading Group, Inc., and Harvest Direct, LLC (collectively defendants), for advertising a bracelet made by iRenew as a revolutionary bracelet that uses the body’s “biofield” to improve strength and wellness. Alleging the advertising claims were false, plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and damages on behalf of all persons in the United States who purchased an iRenew bracelet. Defendants agreed to settle the lawsuit, and the trial court approved a settlement agreement in which defendants would create a fund to reimburse class members for the purchase cost of the bracelet. Pursuant to the agreement, the trial court awarded $215,000 in attorney fees. Appellant Burt Chapa, a class member, objected to the settlement, alleging the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney fees and the notice afforded class members violated due process. We disagree with the first contention but agree with the second. Therefore, we reverse.

Statement.of Facts

1. The Lawsuit

On October 7, 2010, Seryl Litwin filed a class action lawsuit against iRenew for false and misleading advertising in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.