Big League Dreams Chino Hills v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 2014E060596California2,561 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/29/14 Big League Dreams Chino Hills v. Super. Ct. CA4/2

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

BIG LEAGUE DREAMS CHINO HILLS,

LLC,

E060596

Petitioner, (Super.Ct.No. CIVRS1102289) v.

OPINION

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY,

Respondent;

BRIAN HUTCHISON,

Real Party in Interest.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of mandate. Keith D. Davis,

Judge. Petition granted.

Daley & Heft, Lee H. Roistacher, Robert H. Quayle IV, and Christopher M. Busch

for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

1 Brown & Charbonneau, Gregory G. Brown, Eileen M. Solis; Gibson & Hughes,

Jeffrey S. Hughes, Robert B. Gibson; and Donna Bader for Real Party in Interest.

In this case, we conclude that the doctrine of primary assumption of the risk bars a

claim against the operator of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.