Litwin

Litwin v. iRenew

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 2014B248759MCalifornia3,016 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Discussion.

________________________________________________________________________ ROTHSCHILD, Acting P. J. CHANEY, J. MILLER, J. 1

* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1100 and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of parts 1 and 3 of the Discussion. 1 Judge of the Los Angeles Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution. Filed 5/28/14 (unmodified version)

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

SERYL LITWIN et al., B248759

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC447114) v.

iRENEW BIO ENERGY SOLUTIONS,

LLC,

Defendant and Respondent;

BERT CHAPA,

Objector and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Kenneth R. Freeman, Judge. Reversed with directions. Lang, Hanigan & Carvalho, Timothy R. Hanigan for Objector and Appellant. Kirtland & Packard, Michael Louis Kelly, Behram V. Parekh, Heather M. Baker for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Weintraub Tobin Law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.