Staniforth
Staniforth v. Judges' Retirement System
Opinion
Opinion
Mcdonald, J.
Filed 5/19/14; modified and certified for publication 5/29/14 (see orders foll. opn.)
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FAY STANIFORTH et al., D064111
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00093475-CU-MC-CTL) THE JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant and Respondent;
JOHN CHIANG, as State Controller, etc.,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel M.
Pressman, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Jorn S. Rossi and Paul G. Mast for all Plaintiffs and Appellants except William
Reppy, Jr.
William Reppy, Jr., in pro. per.
Reed Smith, Harvey L. Leiderman and Jeffrey R. Rieger for Defendant and
Respondent.
No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Plaintiff Faye Staniforth filed this action, on behalf of herself and similarly
situated persons (collectively pensioners), alleging numerous claims against defendant
and respondent the Judges' Retirement System (JRS). The principal claim raised by
pensioners' action…