Staniforth

Staniforth v. Judges' Retirement System

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 29, 2014D064111California7,334 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

Filed 5/19/14; modified and certified for publication 5/29/14 (see orders foll. opn.)

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FAY STANIFORTH et al., D064111

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00093475-CU-MC-CTL) THE JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,

Defendant and Respondent;

JOHN CHIANG, as State Controller, etc.,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Joel M.

Pressman, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part.

Jorn S. Rossi and Paul G. Mast for all Plaintiffs and Appellants except William

Reppy, Jr.

William Reppy, Jr., in pro. per.

Reed Smith, Harvey L. Leiderman and Jeffrey R. Rieger for Defendant and

Respondent.

No appearance for Real Party in Interest and Respondent. Plaintiff Faye Staniforth filed this action, on behalf of herself and similarly

situated persons (collectively pensioners), alleging numerous claims against defendant

and respondent the Judges' Retirement System (JRS). The principal claim raised by

pensioners' action…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.