People v. Kimbrough CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2014E060389California131 words

Opinion

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. After examination of the

record, counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d

436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a

summary of the facts and potential arguable issues, and requesting this court conduct an

independent review of the record. We offered defendant an opportunity to file a personal

supplemental brief, but he has not done so.

Pursuant to the mandate of People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have

independently reviewed the record for potential error and find no arguable issues.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

2

RAMIREZ

P. J.

We concur:

HOLLENHORST

J.

RICHLI

J.

3