People v. Hedderman CA1/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 30, 2014A140501California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

Humes, J.

Filed 5/30/14 P. v. Hedderman CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A140501

v. JOHN HEDDERMAN, (San Mateo County Super. Ct. No. SC077039) Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant John Hedderman timely appealed after he was sentenced to five years, eight months following his plea of no contest to charges arising out of the unauthorized practice of law and other crimes. His counsel has asked this court for an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) We find no arguable issues and affirm. Hedderman, an attorney whose law license was suspended in 2002, was charged by felony information with 13 counts related to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.