People v. Redente CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2014F067025California979 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

Section 1385 grants trial courts the discretion to dismiss a prior strike conviction if the dismissal is in furtherance of justice. (§ 1385, subd. (a); Romero, supra, 13 Cal.4th at pp. 529-530.) “‘A court’s discretion to strike [or vacate] prior felony conviction allegations [or findings] in furtherance of justice is limited. Its exercise must proceed in strict compliance with … section 1385[, subdivision ](a) .…’” (People v. Williams (1998) 17 Cal.4th 148, 158.) The Three Strikes law “was intended to restrict courts’ discretion in sentencing repeat offenders.” (Romero, supra, at p. 528; People v. Garcia (1999) 20 Cal.4th 490, 501 [“a primary purpose of the Three Strikes law was to restrict judicial discretion”].) The Three Strikes law establishes “‘a sentencing requirement to be applied in every case where the defendant has at least one qualifying strike’” unless the sentencing court finds a reason for making an exception to this rule. (People v. Carmony

All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise noted. Section 667, subdivision (e) provides in relevant part: “[T]he following shall apply where a defendant has one or more prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.