In re Danny M. CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 3, 2014A138844California9,506 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bruiniers, J.

Filed 6/3/14 In re Danny M. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

In re DANNY M., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CHILDREN

AND FAMILY SERVICES BUREAU,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A138844 & A140256 DAVID M., (Contra Costa County Defendant and Appellant; Super. Ct. No. J12-01652)

KELLY R.,

Intervener and Respondent.

Presumptions and policies in determining parental status in dependency proceedings sometimes conflict, as they do here. Dependent minor, Danny M., is now two years old. Two men, David M. and Kelly R., seek recognition of presumed father status. Kelly is Danny’s biological…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.