Crisanto Ragasa v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 4, 201412-72262California185 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISANTO CARINO RAGASA, No. 12-72262 Petitioner, Agency No. v. A037-485-221

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, ORDER Respondent.

Filed June 4, 2014

Before: Michael Daly Hawkins, M. Margaret McKeown, and Carlos T. Bea, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The government’s unopposed motion to amend the opinion is granted. Accordingly, the opinion filed April 28, 2014, 2014 WL 1661491, is amended as follows:

At page 9 of the slip opinion, lines 13–15; 2014 WL 1661491, at *2, the sentence “Because the government has not carried its burden of proving Ragasa’s removability by clear and convincing evidence, we grant the petition and vacate the order of removal.” shall be changed to “Because the government has not carried its burden of proving Ragasa’s removability by clear and convincing evidence, we grant the petition, vacate the order of removal, and remand this case to the BIA with instructions to terminate Ragasa’s removal proceedings.”

At page 9 of the slip opinion, line 18; 2014 WL 1661491, at *3, the sentence “PETITION GRANTED.” shall be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.