Staniforth
Staniforth v. Judges' Retirement System
Opinion
Opinion
Mcdonald, J.
Filed 6/4/14 Original version and modification and certification orders (5/29/14) attached
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FAY STANIFORTH et al., D064111
Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2012-00093475-CU-MC-CTL) THE JUDGES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
Defendant and Respondent; ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
JOHN CHIANG, as State Controller, etc.,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on May 19, 2014, be modified as follows:
On page 18, in the first and second sentences of the second full paragraph, the
word "July" is replaced with the word "January" so the sentences read:
"Pensioners' motion argued the action pleaded claims on behalf of seven trial
judges whose retirement allowances should have been (but were not) calculated and paid
based on the salary of an active trial court jurist as increased by an uncapped COLA until
January 5, 1981, consistent with the trial court's construction of Olson I. Pensioners also
asserted the…