Vargas

Vargas v. Martinez-Senftner Law Firm CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 5, 2014C069218California2,920 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/5/14 Vargas v. Martinez-Senftner Law Firm CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer)

MARIA VARGAS, C069218

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. SCV 17868)

v.

MARTINEZ-SENFTNER LAW FIRM, P.C., et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

Plaintiff prevailed against defendants in her Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, § 12900 et seq.; hereafter FEHA)1 lawsuit and was awarded $368,000 in damages and an additional $211,111.63 in attorney fees. (§ 12965, subd. (b).) (Vargas v. Martinez-Senftner (Dec. 10, 2010, C055633 & C056198) [nonpub. opn.] (Vargas).) Defendants appealed the judgment and the postjudgment order awarding attorney fees, and we affirmed both the judgment and the postjudgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.