Hill

Hill v. Affirmed Housing Group

Bad Law
172 Cal. Rptr. 3d 811·2014 Cal. App. LEXIS 500·226 Cal. App. 4th 1192·2014 WL 2567103
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 9, 2014H038874California2,512 words

Opinion

Opinion

Premo, J.

Plaintiffs James C. Hill and Dawn L. Hill as trustees under a revocable trust dated February 17, 1977 (the Hills), appeal from a postjudgment order awarding contractual attorney fees to Affirmed Housing Group (Affirmed) under Civil Code section 1717.

We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

In the underlying suit, the Hills sued San Jose Family Housing Partners, LLC (LLC), and Affirmed, a managing member of LLC, for alleged violations of a written easement agreement. LLC and Affirmed (collectively defendants) were jointly represented by the law firm of Incorvaia & Associates at a bench trial on the Hills’ claims. In their joint trial brief, defendants argued that, under Corporations Code section former 17101, Affirmed could not be liable for LLC’s actions solely because of its status as a member of LLC. Defendants also jointly argued that the easement could not lawfully be enforced and, in any event, they had not violated the easement.

The trial court ruled that Affirmed was immune from suit under Corporations Code former section 17101, noting that the Hills had presented no evidence to show that Affirmed engaged in any conduct…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.