Loaiza

Loaiza v. Jackson CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 10, 2014B245143California3,527 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/10/14 Loaiza v. Jackson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALEJANDRA LOAIZA, B245143

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. CF027754) v.

STEVEN RANDALL JACKSON,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Lloyd C. Loomis, Judge. Affirmed.

Elizabeth A. Bell for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Law Office of Brian E. Soriano, Brian E. Soriano and Brandon Schantz, for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________ Plaintiff and appellant Alejandra Loaiza appeals from the dismissal of her complaint against defendant and respondent Steven Randall Jackson,1 after the trial court granted respondent’s motion to set aside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.