People v. Mancha CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2014D064797California141 words

Opinion

Rourke, J.

DISCUSSION

Appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings in the

trial court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the

record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to

Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to the possible but not arguable

issue of whether Mancha's plea was knowing and voluntary. We granted Mancha

permission to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so.

Our review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436

and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue referred to by

appellate counsel has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Mancha was

competently represented by counsel on this appeal.

2

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

O'ROURKE, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

McDONALD, J.

3