People v. Mancha CA4/1
Opinion
Rourke, J.
DISCUSSION
Appointed counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings in the
trial court. Counsel presents no argument for reversal but asks this court to review the
record for error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Pursuant to
Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel refers to the possible but not arguable
issue of whether Mancha's plea was knowing and voluntary. We granted Mancha
permission to file a brief on his own behalf, but he did not do so.
Our review of the entire record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436
and Anders v. California, supra, 386 U.S. 738, including the possible issue referred to by
appellate counsel has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Mancha was
competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
2
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
O'ROURKE, J.
WE CONCUR:
BENKE, Acting P. J.
McDONALD, J.
3