IMV 11 Palm v. Pinn CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 2014B246323California6,476 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Filed 6/12/14 IMV 11 Palm v. Pinn CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

IMV 11 PALM, B246323

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GC046072) v.

ALAN R. PINN, et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, C. Edward Simpson, Judge. Reversed.

Shumener, Odson & Oh, Robert J. Odson and Adam C. Doupe for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Saied Kashani for Defendants and Respondents.

______________________________________ IMV 11 Palm LLC (appellant) filed a lawsuit for breach of guaranty and money had and received against respondents Alan Pinn and David Pinn (individually referred to by their first names, collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.