BRS-Tustin Safeguard Assoc. v. Itherx Pharma, Inc. CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 13, 2014D064037California3,172 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/13/14 BRS-Tustin Safeguard Assoc. v. Itherx Pharma, Inc. CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BRS-TUSTIN SAFEGUARD ASSOCIATES D064037

II, LLC,

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00098889- v. CU-BC-CTL )

ITHERX PHARMA, INC.,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Randa

Trapp, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Office of Paul H. Samuels and Paul H. Samuels for Defendant and Appellant.

Catalano & Catalano, Patrick E. Catalano and Mark Adams Poppett for Plaintiff

and Respondent.

ITherX Pharma, Inc. (Pharma) appeals an amended judgment that added it as a

judgment debtor in favor of BRS-Tustin Safeguard Associates II, LLC (BRS) because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.