Hester
Hester v. Vista Pacifica Enterprises, Inc. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
When decedent Rosa T. Weatherley was admitted to Vista Pacifica’s long-term
care facility for the first time, in October 1998, she entered into two arbitration
agreements with Vista Pacifica.1 One of these agreements governs “Arbitration of
Medical Malpractice Disputes.” The second agreement governs “Arbitration of Other
Disputes,” including “any dispute arising between [the parties] from torts, contracts or
otherwise, including any claims for punitive damages and any actions brought on behalf
1 Whether Ms. Weatherley signed the documents herself or they were signed on her behalf is a matter of some dispute between the parties. It is not, however, a dispute that we need to resolve.
2 of the Resident by third-parties, but excepting claims pertaining to the amount of the
Facilities charges . . . .” Both agreements also acknowledge that “the right provided for
in Health and Safety Code Section 1430 to bring a civil action against a facility for a
violation of the regulatory Resident’s Bills of Rights . . . may not be waived.”
(Capitalization omitted.) Both agreements indicate they are to be governed by California
law.