Thompson

Thompson v. OneWest Bank CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 16, 2014H038932California2,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Debbie Alice Thompson, a self-represented litigant, filed an action against defendants OneWest Bank, FSB (OneWest Bank)1; Bank of America; NDeX West, LLC (NDeX West); and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS) alleging that defendants did not have the authority to foreclose on her property after she stopped making payments on a loan. The trial court sustained defendants’ demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend and entered judgments of dismissal. Thompson subsequently moved to vacate the judgment. The court denied the motion and Thompson appeals.

1 OneWest Bank contends it was also erroneously sued in the name of its division IndyMac Mortgage Services, which was erroneously named as IndyMac Mortgage Servicing in Thompson’s pleadings. On appeal, we understand Thompson to contend that the trial court should not have denied her motion to vacate the judgment, and that the court should not have sustained the demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend. For the reasons stated below, we conclude that Thompson fails to show reversible error with respect to the trial court’s denial of her motion to vacate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.