Long Hong v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Long Hong, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.
Hong claims he has a well-founded fear of future persecution by the Chinese government because he provided assistance to North Korean refugees. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Hong failed to establish his fear of persecution is objectively reasonable because his wife, who participated with him in assisting the refugees, remains in China unharmed. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir.2003) (future harm was speculative); Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th Cir.2001) (“[a]n applicant’s claim of persecution upon return is weakened, even undercut, when similarly-situated family members continue to live in the country without incident”). Accordingly, Hong’s asylum claim fails.