People v. Ortiz CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 2014H039863California1,055 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/17/14 P. v. Ortiz CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H039863

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F22932)

v.

FRANCISCO HERNANDEZ ORTIZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Francisco Hernandez Ortiz appeals after pleading no contest to possession of heroin (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)) and admitting that he had a prior strike within the meaning of the Three Strikes law (Pen. Code, § 667, subds. (b)-(i)).1 He was sentenced to a two-year, eight-month prison term. On appeal, defendant’s appointed counsel has filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 that states the case and facts, but raises no issue. We notified defendant of his right…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.