Nansen

Nansen v. City of South Pasadena CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 18, 2014B248711California5,410 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/18/14 Nansen v. City of South Pasadena CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MARK NANSEN et al., B248711

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC493250) v.

CITY OF SOUTH PASADENA et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Susan Bryant-Deason, Judge. Affirmed.

Marvin L. Rudnick for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jones & Mayer, James R. Touchstone and Denise L. Rocawich, for Defendants and Respondents.

******

1 Appellants, Mark and Roberta Nansen, filed a complaint against respondents, City of South Pasadena, Transtech Engineering Inc., Marlon Ramirez and William Reed (hereinafter collectively referred to as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.