Karla Murillo-Rivera v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
580 F. App'x 537
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 19, 201410-71610California237 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Karla Liliana Murillo-Rivera, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for asylum. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying Murillo-Rivera’s asylum claim, the BIA found Murillo-Rivera failed to establish past persecution or a fear of future persecution on account of a protected ground. When the IJ and BIA issued their decisions in this case they did not have the benefit of either this court’s decisions in Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, 707 F.3d 1081 (9th Cir.2013) (en banc), Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106 (9th Cir.2013), and Pirir-Boc v. Holder, 750 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir.2014), or the BIA’s decisions in Matter of M-E-V-G-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 227 (BIA 2014), and Matter of W-G-R-, 26 I. & N. Dec. 208 (BIA 2014). Thus, we remand Murillo-Rivera’s asylum claim to determine the impact, if any, of these decisions. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 , 123 S.Ct. 353 , 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam). In light of this remand, we do not reach Murillo-Rivera’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.