Marshall

Marshall v. Bochner CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 2014D065617California7,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rourke, J.

Filed 6/20/14 Marshall v. Bochner CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ERMA MARSHALL, D065617

Cross-complainant and Appellant,

v. (Super. Ct. No. SCVSS142008)

DAN Z. BOCHNER,

Cross-defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, John

M. Pacheco, Judge. Affirmed.

Greta S. Curtis for the Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Julian Karl Bach for the Cross-defendant and Respondent.

Cross-complainant and appellant Erma Marshall appeals from a judgment on the

pleadings in favor of cross-defendant and respondent Dan Z. Bochner (Bochner) on the

cross-complaint of Marshall and her husband, James Marshall (James), for declaratory

relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.