Marshall
Marshall v. Bochner CA4/1
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 2014D065617California7,053 words
Opinion
Opinion
Rourke, J.
Filed 6/20/14 Marshall v. Bochner CA4/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ERMA MARSHALL, D065617
Cross-complainant and Appellant,
v. (Super. Ct. No. SCVSS142008)
DAN Z. BOCHNER,
Cross-defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, John
M. Pacheco, Judge. Affirmed.
Greta S. Curtis for the Cross-complainant and Appellant.
Julian Karl Bach for the Cross-defendant and Respondent.
Cross-complainant and appellant Erma Marshall appeals from a judgment on the
pleadings in favor of cross-defendant and respondent Dan Z. Bochner (Bochner) on the
cross-complaint of Marshall and her husband, James Marshall (James), for declaratory
relief,…