Dumas

Dumas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 2014C072651California4,116 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/23/14 Dumas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Placer) ----

THOMAS STEVENS DUMAS, C072651

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. SCV27128)

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

With the assistance of defendant loan brokers J & J Lending Corporation (J&J Lending) and Marko Acuna, plaintiff Thomas Stevens Dumas obtained a residential loan from defendant Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. (Paramount), secured by a deed of trust with defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), listed as the beneficiary. Dumas defaulted on the loan and later filed suit against the aforementioned defendants, as well as First Northern Bank…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.