Haver
Haver v. BNSF Railway
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/23/14 (unmodified opinion attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FIVE
JOSHUA HAVER et al., B246527
Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC435551) v.
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
BNSF RAILWAY CO., [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
Defendant and Respondent.
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 3, 2014, and certified for publication, be modified in the following particulars: On page 5, the heading “Defendant’s Challenges to Campbell” should be replaced with “Plaintiffs’ Challenges to Campbell.” On page 5, in the above referenced heading, the first sentence reads: “Defendant initially made two contentions to support his position that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer in reliance on Campbell—Campbell is factually distinguishable, but if not, it was incorrectly decided.” The sentence should be replaced with “Plaintiffs initially made two contentions to support their position that the trial court erred in sustaining the demurrer in reliance on…