Toy

Toy v. Chinatrust Bank CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2014B248567California5,543 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/24/14 Toy v. Chinatrust Bank CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

STANLEY M. TOY, JR., B248567

Cross-complainant and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC406661) v.

CHINATRUST BANK (U.S.A),

Cross-defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Joanne O’Donnell, Judge. Affirmed.

Lizarraga Law Firm, Frank J. Lizarraga, Jr. and Justin M. Crane for Cross- complainant and Appellant.

Saltzburg, Ray & Bergman, Genise R. Reiter and Paul T. Dye for Cross-defendant and Respondent. Stanley M. Toy, Jr. (appellant) appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Chinatrust Bank (U.S.A.) (“Chinatrust”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.