Koopongskul

Koopongskul v. Wooley CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2014H038244California630 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/24/14 Koopongskul v. Wooley CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHAOWALIT KOOPONGSKUL, H038244

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 1-10 CV181607)

v.

BEVERLY HU WOOLEY et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Chaowlit Koopngskul appeals a judgment entered following the trial court’s dismissal of his complaint after sustaining respondents Happy Realty, Beverly Hu Wooley and Stanley Chen’s demurrer without leave to amend. On appeal from a judgment dismissing an action after sustaining a demurrer without leave to amend, we give the complaint a reasonable interpretation, and treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded. (Blank v. Kirwan (1985) 39 Cal.3d 311, 318.) “When a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.