State Of California v. Federal Power Commission

Good Law
345 F.2d 917
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 22, 196519394_1California7,591 words

Opinion

Opinion

345 F.2d 917 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Turlock Irrigation District, California, and Modesto Irrigation District, California, United States of America on the relation of Stewart L. Udall, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent. No. 19394. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. May 18, 1965. Rehearing Denied June 22, 1965. COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of Cal., J. M. Sanderson, Deputy Atty. Gen. of Cal., Sacramento, Cal., for petitioner State of California. Robert L. McCarty, Charles F. Wheatley, Jr., Billy Dwight Perry, of McCarty & Wheatley, Washington, D. C., Jeremy C. Cook, Turlock, Cal., Warren F. Gant, Modesto, Cal., for petitioners Turlock Irr. Dist. and Modesto Irr. Dist. Ramsey Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., Roger P. Marquis, S. Billingsley Hill, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Frank J. Barry, Sol., Dept. of Interior, Edward Weinberg, Deputy Sol., and Wallace L. Duncan, Sp. Asst. to Sol., Dept. of Interior, Washington, D. C., Frank B. Horne, Reg. Sol., Dept. of Interior, Sacramento, Cal., William J. Costello, Field Sol., Dept. of Interior, San Francisco, Cal., for United States on relation of Stewart L. Udall, Sec. of Interior. Richard A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.