Rice

DISCUSSION

We accept as true the facts and reasonable inferences supported by Rice’s evidence, and the defendants’ undisputed evidence, on the motion for summary judgment. (Raghavan v. Boeing Co. (2005) 133 Cal.App.4th 1120, 1125.) Rice contends “there was a dispute of material fact as to whether [she] was incompetent and unable to perform the duties of Transportation Services Manager.” She provides a factual statement nine pages long, most of which mirrors verbatim the allegations in her third amended complaint. We discovered this on our own review, as Rice’s statement of facts contains not a single citation to the record. The only citations to the record in her entire 19-page appellate brief are three citations in her one-page statement of the case, to the trial court’s order sustaining a demurrer to an earlier version of the complaint, an order to strike certain defendants from portions of the third amended complaint, and the order granting summary judgment. The City and Rollinger challenged Rice on this point in their respondents’ brief. Rice did not file a reply brief. We thus are left with no citations to the 731-page record regarding Rice’s purported evidence of…