Big Man Bakes v. Hoskins CA

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 24, 2014B247998California3,553 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chaney, J.

Statement of Facts 1. Insurance Relationship at Issue William Brown and his business partner, Claudine Grier, started a cupcake business called Big Man Bakes in 2009. Both had business experience and Grier had a masters degree in business administration from Columbia University. In June 2009, Grier contacted USI, an insurance brokerage, to obtain insurance for Big Man Bakes. Grier was referred to Hoskins, an insurance broker in USI’s small accounts department in charge of accounts generating less than $5,000 in revenue per year. Hoskins learned Grier sought basic insurance coverage for the cupcake business, which rented a small retail space and commercial kitchen and had no employees. Grier requested a quote for business property and liability coverage and informed Hoskins she wanted to keep the business’s insurance costs low while still satisfying the landlord’s and statutory insurance requirements. Soon thereafter, Hoskins emailed Grier an insurance proposal based on their discussion. Grier responded with some corrections, including modifying the annual sales projection on which the insurance premium was based to get a lower premium. In her emails to Hoskins, Grier referred…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.