People v. McFadden CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2014D065416California583 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

I

"'Waivers of constitutional rights not only must be voluntary but must be knowing,

intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely

consequences.' [Citations.]" (People v. D'Arcy (2010) 48 Cal.4th 257, 284.) "Waivers

may be manifested either orally or in writing. [Citation.] The voluntariness of a waiver

is a question of law which appellate courts review de novo. [Citation.]" (People v.

Pannizon (1996) 13 Cal.4th 68, 80.)

Here, the record clearly shows McFadden manifested his consent to the stipulated

sentence. McFadden's plea agreement states that he was promised a "stipulated 2 years

3 months state prison [sentence] concurrent with any parole or PRCS violation." The plea

agreement makes no reference to a sentence any less than two years eight months. In

fact, McFadden placed his initials next to the paragraph that reads, "I understand that I

may receive this maximum punishment as a result of my plea: 4 y[ea]rs 8 months . . . ."

McFadden also placed his initials next the sentence that reads, "I am entering my plea

freely and voluntarily, without fear or threat to me or anyone closely related…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.