United States v. Gerardo Mosquera

Good Law
580 F. App'x 580
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 25, 201412-30392California648 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Appellant Gerardo Mosquera (“Mosqu-era”) was convicted of and sentenced for two counts of a federal theft offense under 18 U.S.C. § 666 (a)(1)(A). On appeal, he challenges his conviction on speedy trial grounds, and separately argues that the district court erred in denying his request for a downward departure based on the conditions of his pretrial confinement in Columbia, in imposing a two-level upward adjustment for obstruction of justice, and another two-level upward adjustment for misuse of a Social Security number.

1. We do not reach the merits of Mos-quera’s contentions that his speedy trial rights were violated because we conclude that these claims were waived. First, Mosquera waived his rights under the Speedy Trial Act by failing to file a motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds before trial. See 18 U.S.C. § 3162 (a)(2). We similarly conclude that Mosquera voluntarily and knowingly waived his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial. Although Mosquera initially objected to a continuance, he consented to the continuance after the district court explained that it was in his best interest to allow his attorney time to prepare for trial and he agreed to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.