People v. Nittie CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2014B252618California874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/25/14 P. v. Nittie CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE, B252618

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MA056225) v.

FRANK EDWARD NITTIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Charles A. Chung, Judge. Affirmed. Eileen M. Rice, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________________

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

After his girlfriend reported to police that her jewelry and laptop computer were missing, Frank Edward Nittie admitted that he had taken them from her home and pawned them. On June 12, 2012 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.