Pershadsingh

Filed 6/25/14 Pershadsingh v. County of Los Angeles CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

RAJENDRA PERSHADSINGH, B247727

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC456526) v.

THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elihu M. Berle, Judge. Affirmed. Huskinson, Brown & Heidenreich, David W.T. Brown and Paul E. Heidenreich for Plaintiff and Appellant. Nossaman, Lloyd W. Pellman, Winfield D. Wilson and Stephen P. Wiman for Defendant and Respondent. In 1991, the County of Los Angeles (County) implemented a 2 percent increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax (tax) applicable to hotel stays in the County.…