Fengmin Cao v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
580 F. App'x 616
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 201412-73996California269 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Fengmin Cao, a native and citizen of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, applying the standards governing adverse credibility determinations created by the REAL ID Act. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1039-40 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s adverse credibility determination based on omissions in Cao’s asylum application and written statement and inconsistencies in his testimony regarding a police beating, a requirement to report to the police once a month, going into hiding, and applying for a marriage permit. See Zamanov v. Holder, 649 F.3d 969, 974 (9th Cir.2011) (omitted incidents of arrest and mistreatment supported adverse credibility finding); Shrestha, 590 F.3d at 1048 (totality of the circumstances supported adverse credibility determination). In the absence of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.