Frederick Paulus v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
580 F. App'x 629
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 201412-71641California379 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Frederick Delano Paulus, and his family, natives and citizens of Indonesia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.

We deny petitioners’ motion to take judicial notice of the 2010 and 2011 State Department reports and we do not consider them. See Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955, 963-64 (9th Cir.1996) (en banc) (the court’s review is limited to the administrative record).

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s finding that petitioners have not established the incidents Paulus experienced in Indonesia rose to the level of persecution, where Paulus was never physically harmed or threatened. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1012, 1016-18 (9th Cir.2003) (discrimination and harassment do not constitute persecution); see also Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1060 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.