United States v. Steven Debord

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 201413-30290California220 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-30290

Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00019-DWM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

STEVEN KENT DeBORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014**

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

Steven Kent DeBord appeals from the revocation of supervised release and

14-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), DeBord’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided DeBord the opportunity to file a pro se…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.