United States v. Steven Debord
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 27, 201413-30290California220 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 27 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 13-30290
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 2:11-cr-00019-DWM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
STEVEN KENT DeBORD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 25, 2014**
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
Steven Kent DeBord appeals from the revocation of supervised release and
14-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), DeBord’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provided DeBord the opportunity to file a pro se…