In re Thomas H. CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2014A139248California2,851 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

On May 14, 2013, a wardship petition was filed alleging that 16-year-old appellant, already a ward of the court,1 had committed a robbery (Pen. Code, § 211) while personally using a firearm (Pen. Code, § 12022.53, subd. (b)). The petition was subsequently amended to add a second count alleging possession of a firearm in a school zone (Pen. Code, § 626.9, subd. (b)).

1 Appellant had two previously sustained wardship petitions for burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), from May and July 2012.

1 The jurisdictional hearing began on June 12. The court denied appellant’s motion to exclude statements made to the police by M.E., who was charged in the same incident and a subject of the same jurisdictional hearing. On June 14, the court found true the allegations of robbery and personal use of a firearm. It made no finding on the allegation of possession of a firearm in a school zone. On June 28, the court continued appellant as a ward and committed him to the custody of the probation officer for placement in a suitable foster home or facility. The maximum time of confinement, for the current and previously sustained petitions, was found to be 17 years and eight months.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.